“It’s quite dramatic, the number of ways these kids are deprived.”
By on March 23rd, 2011

Harvard Medical SchoolCharles Nelson, professor of pediatrics at Harvard Medical School and director of research at Harvard-affiliated Children’s Hospital Boston Developmental Medicine Center conducted a study of 136 Romanian children in both government-run orphanages and high-quality foster care.

The results have not only provided a host of statistics about several types of developmental delays that occur in institutional care, they also provided impetus for the Romanian government to begin its own foster system and to pass a law prohibiting institutionalization of children younger than age 2.

Nelson presented results of his work at the Center for Population and Development Studies.  The study covered six orphanages and it began in 2000.  The initial assessments found children in conditions so wrenching, Nelson said, that researchers had a rule that they wouldn’t cry in front of the children and sometimes had to excuse themselves to step out of the room.

Babies under age 1 or 2 spent their days lying on their backs, staring at the blank ceiling over their cribs, leading to a high prevalence of crossed eyes, which went away as they got older, became more active, and exercised their eye muscles.

Caregiver ratios were high, with one caregiver to 15 babies, and one caregiver to 20 to 25 toddlers. Conditions tended to be better at urban institutions, but in some rural institutions, Nelson said, children were chained to the beds for years on end.

“On the whole it was just breathtakingly awful,” Nelson said. “One of the eeriest things about these institutions is how quiet they are. Nobody’s crying.” The study identified institutionalized children between ages 6 months and 31 months, half of whom went to families participating as foster parents. Another 72 children living with their families in the community also participated as controls.

Results show that developmental delays are not always related solely to length of stay in an institution, but are also influenced by the timing of the institutionalization. Babies develop rapidly in response to environment during their first months. Living in an environment devoid of stimulation can lead to developmental delays in a variety of areas. Children suffered in many ways in the institution, Nelson said, and benefited more from foster care the younger they were when they left the institution.

“It’s quite dramatic, the number of ways these kids are deprived,” Nelson said. Institutionalized children were often physically stunted, Nelson said, with delayed growth not related to malnourishment. The stunting happened despite balanced diets at the institutions, he said. Once in foster care, he said, children began to grow and catch up to their peers. If they don’t catch up it is often head size that is lacking, Nelson said, which translates to smaller brain size and lasting cognitive problems.

In testing for intelligence, institutionalized children averaged a score of 74, on the threshold of mental retardation, compared with 103 with the community control group. After a period of foster care, IQs jumped about 10 points, Nelson said, an amount that would make a difference in school performance or functioning as an adult. The timing of the deinstitutionalization seems critical, as children older than 2 years when they went into foster care were less likely to experience improvements.

Language development fared even worse, Nelson said. No institutionalized child was normal in language development, with evidence showing a critical age for language development even younger than that for intelligence.

“If we thought IQ was deleteriously affected, language was clobbered,” Nelson said.  Tests showed increased prevalence of psychiatric disorders among institutionalized children. Foster care helped those experiencing anxiety and depression, but not those with outwardly manifested conditions such as ADHD and oppositional defiant disorder.

Testing also showed widespread attachment problems among institutionalized children, with just 20 percent at 42 months having a secure attachment and another 20 percent with no attachment at all. A high proportion of children in the study showed a type of attachment disorder where they were socially uninhibited and overly trusting of strangers.

During one test, in which a stranger comes to the door and unexpectedly asks the child to come with him, 55 percent of institutionalized children went with the stranger, while 25 percent of foster children did. Just one of the community control children did.  “Kids at 54 months just don’t do this,” Nelson said. “What we’re worried about is when these kids exit the institution, how ready will they be for the real world?”

Eight million orphaned and abandoned children live in government-run institutions, sometimes in horrific conditions that take a lasting physical and mental toll.  The number are increasing. War and disease are orphaning children around the world in staggering numbers. AIDS alone is expected to have created 25 million orphans by this year, with more than one in 10 children under age 15 orphaned in a dozen African countries, according to UNICEF.  The problem isn’t just an African one, however. In Central and Eastern Europe, an estimated 1.5 million children live in public care, while the number of children without parental care in Russia has doubled in 10 years.

Join the revolution and make room for these chldren in your home!

You can read  more at



Leave a Reply

Orphan Justice Center
P.O. Box 877
Grandview, MO 64030

Copyright © 2008 - 2019 Orphan Justice Center.
All rights reserved.